Chaos Erupts as Masked Federal Agents Face Backlash in St. Paul Showdown

Paul Riverbank, 1/15/2026Masked federal agents spark backlash in St. Paul, igniting debate over trust, transparency, and law.
Featured Story

It would be easy to mistake the commotion at Cancun Mexican Grill & Cantina last Sunday for just another busy afternoon. But if you’d been there, squeezed into a booth or halfway through a plate of enchiladas, the reality was far from routine. Federal agents—face coverings snug, their movements brisk and practiced—wove a line through the tables. The intrusion was so sudden, some diners barely had time to stop chewing before tempers began to flare.

Phones shot up. Curses volleyed across the room. Someone, voice sharp, demanded they show a warrant. Others, pointing to the “employees only” sign, challenged their right to be there. Angry shouts punctuated by the kind of language you wouldn’t repeat to your grandmother ricocheted between tables, as agents pressed forward—reluctant targets of a restaurant full of skepticism and half-eaten meals.

This wasn’t just about Sunday lunch. In Minnesota, a series of fraught encounters between federal authorities and the public has turned routine law enforcement into political flashpoints. Just a few weeks ago, Renee Nicole Good was fatally shot by an agent from Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Minneapolis. Homeland Security contends she rammed an officer with her car. Critics, including some lawmakers, use a single, damning word—“murder.” The incident peeled back wounds that never quite healed here, reigniting confrontations in city council chambers and on street corners.

Those tensions were laid bare at Cancun, where agents claimed a legal right to traverse the “public” part of a business. Their masks—supposedly for their own safety against doxxing, according to ICE officials—did little to calm nerves. To many in the packed restaurant, the shrouded faces seemed less a shield than a symbol: an agent faceless, accountability blurred.

Governor Tim Walz, a Democrat not given to flashy public statements, has already marked his calendar for an address about the federal government’s reach in Minnesota. City and state officials, uneasy and under pressure, have pressed a federal judge to freeze ICE activity within state lines—an effort currently waiting in judicial limbo. Meanwhile, in quiet conversations and loud committee hearings, local leaders debate trust. State Senator Lindsey Port, representing Burnsville, wants legislation that would ban face coverings for any law enforcement on duty, federal or otherwise. Her reasoning is simple, if blunt: “Trust is all we have left, and it’s slipping through our fingers.”

The agents, for their part, say the masks aren’t about secrecy. "We’ve seen what happens when protestors track our names online," one ICE official told me, referencing incidents elsewhere where agents’ home addresses and families’ details have appeared on social media. For officers, the risks feel more immediate than abstract debates about transparency.

Still, to residents and local officials trying to maintain the delicate balance of public order, that explanation rings hollow. Minneapolis, Minneapolis, and city halls statewide are now drafting ordinances that could throttle cooperation with masked federal agents. A similar stance is already codified in Minneapolis; police there say working with those who hide their identities undermines the very values they’re supposed to enforce.

It’s impossible to ignore the shadow cast by past tragedies. When former House Speaker Melissa Hortman was killed in June by a man wearing a mask and impersonating an officer, the ripple effect was immediate—underscoring why, in the eyes of lawmakers, visible identification is more than a courtesy. “I can’t promise new rules will stop people who disregard the law,” Senator Port concedes, “but we need laws that make trust possible, not impossible.”

In places like Cancun Mexican Grill—part sanctuary, part battleground—the dilemma isn’t theoretical. Minnesotans now watch as a string of tense moments wind their way from police reform hearings to courtrooms and legislative floors. Answers about who gets to wear a mask, carry a badge, and walk unchallenged across the public-private threshold remain distant. Yet the urgency is unmistakable. In a state where ordinary meals can turn extraordinary in an instant, every new brush between agents and citizens now carries the weight of unfinished business.