Clash of Titans: Congress and DOJ Locked in Fierce Battle Over Biden Audio Tapes
Paul Riverbank, 6/16/2024Congress and the Department of Justice are locked in a fierce battle over the release of Biden audio tapes. The House demands the tapes as evidence of Biden's mental lapses, while the Justice Department claims executive privilege. This showdown raises questions about justice, politics, and the balance of power.
The whole country holds its breath as Congress and the Department of Justice face off in a heated showdown that goes to the heart of our system of checks and balances. Speaker Mike Johnson and the House of Representatives are determined to bring the Biden audio tapes issue to court, despite the Department of Justice deciding not to charge Attorney General Merrick Garland with contempt of Congress.
"It is sadly predictable that the Biden Administration's Justice Department will not prosecute Garland for defying congressional subpoenas even though the department aggressively prosecuted Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro for the same thing," Johnson declared, his words echoing the sentiments of those who perceive a "two-tiered system of justice" at play.
At the heart of this legal quagmire lies the House's demand for the audio recordings of President Joe Biden's deposition with Special Counsel Robert Hur -- a request met with staunch resistance from the Justice Department, which claims executive privilege. The Department, in a sharply worded letter, asserted: "Consistent with this longstanding position and uniform practice, the Department has determined that the responses by Attorney General Garland to the subpoenas issued by the Committees did not constitute a crime, and accordingly the Department will not bring the congressional contempt citation before a grand jury or take any other action to prosecute the Attorney General."
Yet the House remains undeterred, fueled by suspicions that the written transcripts provided by Garland fail to capture the full extent of Biden's "poor memory" and mental lapses -- lapses that, according to Hur's report, were significant enough to preclude prosecution for the mishandling of classified information. "Republicans wanted the audio tapes of Hur's interview with Biden. Garland had only provided written transcripts, which Republicans said were insufficient after Hur revealed that Biden experienced mental lapses and 'poor memory' during his interview," the reports state.
The battle lines are drawn, with the Justice Department invoking executive privilege and the House vowing to enforce the subpoena in federal court. "I will be certifying the contempt reports to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia," Johnson declared, his tone resolute. "We will also move to enforce the subpoena of Attorney General Garland in federal court."
Yet, as the saga unfolds, concerns arise over the perceived double standards and the specter of political motivations. The Department's decision not to prosecute Garland stands in stark contrast to its zealous pursuit of charges against former Trump advisers Bannon and Navarro for similar offenses -- a disparity that has fueled accusations of a "two-tiered system of justice."
Moreover, the House's pursuit of the audio tapes carries an undeniable political undertone, with Republicans eager to portray Biden as a "frail leader with a poor memory who's too old to serve another term in the Oval Office." They think the tapes could be used in campaign ads and change how people think, making an already confusing legal fight even more complicated.
As the nation watches this intense drama play out, we're left thinking about the bigger picture: the balance between Congress keeping an eye on things and the president's right to keep things private, how the court system stays fair, and how politics influences court battles. What happens here will affect more than just Congress and the Justice Department. It'll shape how checks and balances work and the core of American democracy itself.
More Like This
