‘Daddy’s Home’: Trump’s Campaign Style Redefines GOP Strategy
Paul Riverbank, 12/10/2025Trump's rallies, nicknames, and bold moves redefine GOP messaging—keeping all eyes on him.
There’s a certain theater to Donald Trump’s rallies, and last week in Pennsylvania, he gave his supporters something new to chew on. In the middle of an otherwise typical evening—Mount Airy Casino Resort, a familiar crowd—he paused for a grin and turned his attention to “Susie Trump.” The audience blinked. Susie Trump? Some caught on quickly: Susie Wiles, his campaign’s chief of staff and a fixture behind the scenes, suddenly rebranded by the president himself. It was as if he’d decided, in that moment, to tie her identity even closer to his own.
These public christenings are signature Trump. He’s rarely content to use established titles without a twist. If there’s a conversation simmering in the broader culture—about what language is offensive, or why institutions rethink job titles like “chief”—he’ll put his spin on it, whether or not he wades into the debate directly. His aside about “chief of staff,” making light of recent disputes over the word “chief”—like the San Francisco school board’s move to scrap the term out of sensitivity—was both a wink and a shrug.
Susie Wiles, the campaign operative in question, has her own approach to these shifts. Appearing on The Mom View, a YouTube program for conservative mothers, she explained a new playbook for driving up turnout in the midterms. Traditionally, parties try to localize these off-year races, keeping the national figureheads out. Not this time, she said. Trump would be the centerpiece, even without his name on the ballot. According to Wiles, those “low propensity” voters show up for him; the strategy banks on the magnetism of one name—the one she now humorously shares.
Nicknaming and narrative control aren’t new tactics around Trump world, yet lately, the vocabulary has evolved. On the global stage, there’s been playful chatter about who “Daddy” is. NATO’s Secretary General Mark Rutte recently made headlines, noting that Europeans sometimes treat Washington as the family patriarch—wondering aloud, “Daddy, are you staying with us?” Trump, naturally, took it in stride, tossing a casual “He did it very affectionately, ‘Daddy, you’re my Daddy’” back at the press. It’s the sort of exchange that would seem surreal in another era, yet it’s now almost routine fare.
The “Daddy” moniker isn’t just for foreign dignitaries. At a rally not too long ago, Tucker Carlson took the stage and ran with the metaphor, describing Trump as a father figure who disciplines wayward children. It was a moment meant for social media more than television—provocative, even a bit theatrical—but it found an eager audience, online and off. Within days, cartoons of Trump in a Santa hat, “Daddy’s Home” splashed overhead, began circulating from official channels, reinforcing the paternal theme.
Outside of the spectacle, the administration’s decisions keep stoking debate. Recently, a portrait inside the Department of Health and Human Services was updated: “Richard Levine,” not Rachel, the former admiral’s birth name, was restored to the portrait. Critics blasted the move as “deadnaming”—a loaded term in transgender advocacy—while officials defended it as a return to what they called biological and scientific “gold standards.” Predictably, the response from activists was swift and sharp, with California’s Scott Wiener promising to reverse the changes if his side wins back the levers of power. The debate, bitter and highly charged, shows no sign of fading.
If there’s a thread running through all of this—from affectionate labels to policy pronouncements—it’s one of narrative control. Team Trump favors bold acts and eye-catching language, whether that means dubbing a staffer “Susie Trump,” leaning into memes about “Daddy” in world affairs, or making a symbolic gesture in the corridors of government. Each instance draws critics and supporters into the fray. The effect? Trump remains the center of gravity, every storyline bending, sometimes unpredictably, back toward his orbit.
In this media environment, the lines between campaign strategy, personal branding, and official action blur. One day it’s a playful rally riff; the next, a contentious personnel move or a viral video from the White House. Yet in every case, the focus is the same: attention directed, relentlessly, to him and to those branded in his image. And as long as he holds the stage, the conversation—however contentious—rarely strays far from his chosen script.