Florida Nurse FIRED After Vicious Attack on Pregnant Trump Spokeswoman!
Paul Riverbank, 1/24/2026Nurse fired after wishing harm on pregnant Trump aide, sparking debates over professionalism and speech.
When a labor and delivery nurse in Boca Raton hit “post” on a TikTok video in April, she may not have anticipated just how far her words would travel, or how swiftly her world would tilt. Lexie Lawler’s 20-second clip—laced with acrimony—targeted White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, who’d recently shared the happy news of her pregnancy. “As a labor and delivery nurse, it gives me great joy to wish Karoline Leavitt a fourth-degree tear,” Lawler said, raw emotion punctuating each word. Even by today’s standards of online ire, wishing a catastrophic injury upon a pregnant woman struck a nerve.
The video didn’t simmer quietly in some secluded corner of the internet. Within hours, it was ricocheting across social media, amplified by influential accounts and, soon, news outlets. Viewers—many of them healthcare professionals—were stunned, horrified, and quick to weigh in. If there’s one thing hospitals depend on, it’s trust: that fragile but vital thread binding patients and caregivers, regardless of background or beliefs.
Word reached Baptist Health Boca Raton Regional Hospital without delay. The hospital found itself in a familiar modern scramble—review the evidence, weigh its next steps, and issue a public response before a social media wildfire could consume its reputation. By the next day, Lawler was no longer employed there. Ryan Lieber, the hospital’s communications manager, tried to strike a careful tone in a release. “The comments made in a social media video by a nurse at one of our facilities do not reflect our values or the standards we expect,” he wrote, adding with finality: “Our focus remains squarely on trust, professionalism, and respect—for every patient and every member of our team.”
As news of Lawler’s firing spread, civic leaders stepped in. Boca Raton’s mayor announced he’d reached out to the hospital, expressing concern on behalf of a neighborhood suddenly thrust into a national drama. The climate online, always quick to polarize, produced a rare moment of agreement: wishing evil on anyone, pregnant or not, cannot be squared with the duties of a healthcare professional.
Of course, the matter reverberated well beyond state lines. Politicians and pundits, some with a habit of hunting viral moments, splashed the story across various platforms. Yet, outside the echo chambers, you could hear an undercurrent of deeper unease—about where the boundaries of “acceptable” speech should lie, particularly for those in the business of care. The First Amendment is no shield for cruelty, insisted some. Others asked: Can’t people keep separate who they are on the job from who they are online?
The debate inevitably zeroed in on professionalism. Hospitals, after all, aren’t like city parks or coffee shops. Patients arrive frightened, sometimes desperate. They expect—and indeed, deserve—medical staff whose allegiance is to well-being first, in every interaction. Even a stray online comment, posted in haste and anger, can unravel the delicate fabric of trust essential to medicine.
In the end, Lawler’s case is another chapter in an ongoing argument: how society calibrates freedom of speech, accountability, and basic decency. The viral spectacle faded fast, but the message was clear enough for health workers in every corner—your words, spoken or posted, travel further than you think. And some lines, once crossed, demand an unequivocal response.