House on the Brink: Thin GOP Majority Barely Keeps Government Afloat
Paul Riverbank, 1/15/2026Congress narrowly avoids shutdown, but deep divisions and funding deadlines fuel ongoing political drama.
Congress, once again, has managed to keep the government’s lights on—at least for now. After a week of late-night shuffling and pointed exchanges, lawmakers in the House crossed a crucial item off their to-do list: funding for the Treasury and State departments, the IRS, and select national security programs. The package—cleared with a vote of 341 to 79—emerged after enough compromise to make longtime observers shake their heads at how challenging even basic governing has become.
But don’t mistake this as a clear path forward. The specter of a government shutdown hasn’t disappeared. Instead, it’s simply been nudged down the hall. A slew of deadlines still looms, and only three out of the 12 annual spending bills have made it through. President Trump has already signed off on four—including measures for agriculture and veterans—but if Congress wants to avoid another embarrassing halt in operations, nine more bills demand attention.
The recently passed “minibus” wasn’t exactly drama-free. House Speaker Mike Johnson tried to project confidence, flatly stating, “We’re totally in control of the House,” as if saying it loudly enough might make it true. However, hints of trouble slipped through the cracks. Five Republicans were absent during a crucial preliminary vote—just one more missing member could have toppled the entire effort. This razor-thin majority amplifies every stray “no,” making each vote an exercise in anxiety.
Originally, the plan bundled Homeland Security funding into this bill. Yet, following a fatal incident in Minneapolis involving a federal immigration officer, the political calculus shifted sharply. Democrats pressed for tighter controls on immigration enforcement, which Republicans viewed as a bridge too far. Rather than risk sinking the entire package, party leaders yanked Homeland Security from this round, postponing that heated fight until next week—if not later.
Not every proposal survived the backroom negotiations. Some conservative members, eyeing the judiciary in the capital, pushed to shrink funding for D.C. courts and strip pay from a few judges—an unmistakable nod to battles from the last administration. Others wanted a sharp, 20% reduction to D.C. city funding and cuts to the National Endowment for Democracy. By the time the dust settled, these amendments didn’t make the final lineup.
That hasn’t stopped certain Republicans from touting the deal’s “wins” on social media. They point to trims in foreign aid and restrained spending, talking points designed to resonate with the conservative base that still expects confrontation over compromise. Meanwhile, some of their more conservative colleagues openly lament that past legislative victories—if they can be called that—didn’t go far enough. As chatter continues about a second, GOP-driven tax and spending package, skepticism lingers. Rep. Nick LaLota, tongue in cheek, tossed cold water on the notion: “Every member is going to think it's their moment in time to get their thing in, which is why I’m not optimistic about Reconciliation Two this Congress.”
But others, like Rep. August Pfluger, see paralysis as the greater danger. “There’s a massive risk of not doing something,” he cautioned, urging fellow Republicans to “unify, to work together, and to get the job done.”
The pressure isn’t just procedural—it’s political. With the 43-day shutdown from last year fresh in everyone’s minds, and the midterm elections already coloring every move, the stakes for both parties couldn’t be higher. For the moment, Congress has managed to dodge another shutdown. Yet, as the clock ticks toward another funding deadline, the real test—for both leadership and party discipline—still lies ahead. Washington, it seems, will continue walking this legislative tightrope for the foreseeable future.