Rebellion on the Right: Greene Defies Trump, Conservative Alliances Fray
Paul Riverbank, 12/11/2025Torn alliances rock the right: Pentagon pivots, Greene defies Trump, conservative identity faces reckoning.
A stray remark from General Dan Caine last weekend, uttered to a crowd gathered at the Reagan National Defense Forum, set off a chain reaction that rippled through Washington’s think tanks, newsrooms, and even down through ordinary late-night chatter. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs didn’t mince words: America, he hinted, has pulled its military punch close to home for too long. “If you look back over the arc of our deployment history over the last few years, we haven’t had a lot of American combat power in our own neighborhood. ... I suspect that’s probably going to change.”
That brief statement had the capital atwitter by Monday morning—think-tank types whispering in elevators, pundits sparring across cable news panels before the coffee had even cooled. Some heard a message about retreat: was America, they wondered, abandoning its self-appointed role as traffic cop on the world stage? Words like “reckless isolationism” started to bounce around.
On the other end, Glenn Beck’s studio lights beamed bright as ever. He took to the airwaves with a hint of glee. “They hate it because it flips the script on everything we’ve been told for a century,” Beck said, hands slicing at the air. “Global police? That’s not the gig anymore. It’s time to patch the roof at home.” For those who’ve always bristled at endless deployments and distant entanglements, Beck’s framing landed like a relief—almost an overdue bit of self-respect.
He built his case with a two-part refrain: America needed the mightiest military, yes, but also the world’s fiercest economy and “spirit.” The recipe? Fortified borders, dialing down the “forever wars,” and out-hustling China on every front: economic, technological, strategic. “Let’s make our allies pull their weight,” he said, not quite with a wink, “and let ourselves feel good about being Americans again.”
Offstage, another sort of tension quietly escalated. For Brian Glenn, known inside the press gallery as someone never shy about supporting Donald Trump, there was turbulence closer to home. Glenn covers the White House for Real America’s Voice, or at least he used to until recently. That was before he got caught in the fallout of a political breakup: his partner, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, had broken ranks with Trump over the hot-button release of the Epstein documents and found herself mixing at Democrat-sponsored events. That didn’t sit right with her old ally. Trump fired a tweet branding Greene “a traitor,” yanked his endorsement, and for Greene, the sour taste was enough. She announced she’d leave Congress in January.
Glenn, suddenly feeling like, in his own words, “the little divorced kid in the middle,” stepped back—not just from the fray, but from his coveted seat at White House briefings. “Like, what are you talking about, man? She’s one of your biggest supporters,” Glenn confided in the Post, still incredulous at Trump’s public shaming of his partner. “She differs on a couple of issues, but she’s still very much on your side. She never left!”
Now, Glenn is packing up for Georgia, where Greene and a new home studio are waiting, and Real America’s Voice aims to rebuild its influence outside the capital’s press scrum. The move marks more than a change in location – it signals a shift in the pecking order inside the conservative media orbit, and perhaps a rebalancing among Trump loyalists themselves.
Stepping back from the personalities and intrigue, both the Pentagon’s pivot and the Glenn-Greene saga speak to the same simmering debate: who, exactly, does the conservative movement represent? Is it the nationalists, content to fortify the homeland and withdraw from far-off commitments? Or is it still the party of muscular intervention abroad? Maybe, as Beck pushed his audience to consider, it comes down to rediscovering a sense of American purpose—something larger than factional showdowns or tactical victories.
In these debates—sometimes raw, often personal—the questions aren’t always about generals or soundbites, but about the national character itself. As Brian Glenn, reluctantly stepping away from the White House, put it: “Maybe it shouldn’t be about the elites at all. Maybe it’s about regular folks and what kind of country we want to live in.” For now, at least, the answers remain up for grabs.